top of page

‘And another thing…’

Writer: Kevin Armor Harris
Kevin Armor Harris
Aug 4
1 min read
Red pen

I need to try to stop doing this, but I can’t help being irritated by the failure of editors to intervene when a phrase in a text is glaringly wrong. We writers make mistakes occasionally and overlook things: one of the reasons is that the literary industry encourages excess (‘…we need at least 350 pages to make it economic…’) and too seldom pays attention to wordcraft.


I recently bought, too hurriedly, a copy of Name, a short novel by Constance Debré, endorsed on the cover, unfortunately, by Olivia Laing and Colm Tóibín among others. I made it as far as page 35, where I read the narrator’s comment about the bourgeoisie, described as ‘an infinitely large sample of the population’. This isn’t me being picky: it’s sloppy at best.


I don’t understand how a serious writer can describe a sample as infinitely large, but if they do, how a translator can fail to draw attention to it, or a publisher’s editor (or other reader) can overlook it. I can’t read any further, the book goes to a charity shop. Sigh. Rant over.


Recent Posts

See All
All in one superhuman breath

I’d really like to get away from this theme, but the examples keep finding me. On reflection it’s mostly the plaudits on the covers of books which contain sloppy writing, that annoys me to the point o

 
 
Nabokov’s 'dark dog nipples'

As I’ve been commenting on the role of editors and, to a lesser extent, translators, I was reminded of an anecdote I read many years ago, concerning the translation of one of Vladimir Nabokov’s novels

 
 

​

bottom of page